Post by account_disabled on Feb 15, 2024 11:06:13 GMT
The European Court of Human Rights has condemned Belgium for violating the right to a fair judicial process, finding that the procedure, which has dragged on for almost eight years, has not been carried out in a reasonable time . Also remember that these delays in the administration of justice put the effectiveness and credibility of the system at risk.
In this case, the plaintiff filed a lawsuit, in 2015, before the Court of First Instance of Brussels to have the sale of an apartment annulled due to lack of consent . In the alternative, he requested that the defendants be ordered to pay him an amount equal to the difference between the sale price and the price of the property, or that the sales contract be Ireland Email List declared null and void due to negligence and that the sale price be refunded. , or that compensation for damages be granted. He also requested that an expert be appointed to determine the value of the property and the cost of the works already carried out and pending to be carried out. In 2017, the court dismissed the request to annul the sale, but appointed an expert and re-filed the case. The defendants appealed this decision. The expert presented the report the following year.
In 2018, when the case was ready for hearing on appeal, the Registry of the Court of Appeal in Brussels informed the plaintiff that his case was on a waiting list and that it could not secure a date before March 2026 . The plaintiff contacted the president of the Court of Appeal to try to get him to review the situation. In 2021, a ruling was issued confirming the initial resolution, issued in 2017. A hearing was then initially scheduled for March 2022, but was later postponed until November 2023, due to the absence of the judge in charge of the matter and the lack of titular judges .
According to Article 6 of the European Convention on Human Rights, everyone has the right to a fair trial, which includes that it takes place within a reasonable time.
El Gobierno belga argumentó que el demandante debería haber interpuesto una reclamación por daños derivados del mal funcionamiento de la Administración de Justicia. Sin embargo, replica el tribunal, no consiguió demostrar que esa acción hubiese progresado de una forma más rápida y efectiva que el procedimiento principal por el que se acudió al TEDH, teniendo en cuenta que debería ser tramitado por los mismos órganos judiciales cuya lentitud se denuncia. Esto sin contar con que la Administración se podía haber opuesto a aquella reclamación, generando un mayor retraso en la compensación del daño. Por ello, no consideran que una reclamación de daños fuera efectiva para resarcir los efectos de la lentitud excesiva del procedimiento.
In this case, the plaintiff filed a lawsuit, in 2015, before the Court of First Instance of Brussels to have the sale of an apartment annulled due to lack of consent . In the alternative, he requested that the defendants be ordered to pay him an amount equal to the difference between the sale price and the price of the property, or that the sales contract be Ireland Email List declared null and void due to negligence and that the sale price be refunded. , or that compensation for damages be granted. He also requested that an expert be appointed to determine the value of the property and the cost of the works already carried out and pending to be carried out. In 2017, the court dismissed the request to annul the sale, but appointed an expert and re-filed the case. The defendants appealed this decision. The expert presented the report the following year.
In 2018, when the case was ready for hearing on appeal, the Registry of the Court of Appeal in Brussels informed the plaintiff that his case was on a waiting list and that it could not secure a date before March 2026 . The plaintiff contacted the president of the Court of Appeal to try to get him to review the situation. In 2021, a ruling was issued confirming the initial resolution, issued in 2017. A hearing was then initially scheduled for March 2022, but was later postponed until November 2023, due to the absence of the judge in charge of the matter and the lack of titular judges .
According to Article 6 of the European Convention on Human Rights, everyone has the right to a fair trial, which includes that it takes place within a reasonable time.
El Gobierno belga argumentó que el demandante debería haber interpuesto una reclamación por daños derivados del mal funcionamiento de la Administración de Justicia. Sin embargo, replica el tribunal, no consiguió demostrar que esa acción hubiese progresado de una forma más rápida y efectiva que el procedimiento principal por el que se acudió al TEDH, teniendo en cuenta que debería ser tramitado por los mismos órganos judiciales cuya lentitud se denuncia. Esto sin contar con que la Administración se podía haber opuesto a aquella reclamación, generando un mayor retraso en la compensación del daño. Por ello, no consideran que una reclamación de daños fuera efectiva para resarcir los efectos de la lentitud excesiva del procedimiento.